Community, Religion and Beer

March 31st, 2011   by   Andrew

There has been a massive boom in the diversity of beer over the last twenty years. This has changed the definition of a beer drinker.

In the recent past, if you were a Coors drinker, then that meant you drank Coors and would likely only drink something else if someone else gave you a beer to drink. If you were a Coors drinker, you bought Coors and that was about it.

A Coors drinker today is someone that buys Coors and drinks Coors some or most of the time. Sometimes a change is good. Sometimes you might feel like trying Bud, or Miller, or Keystone, or even an import.

In Canada, the big breweries ignored this for a little while. Then a smaller brewery called Lakeport changed things on them. Lakeport put out a simple line of beers, got distributed well, and started to take a large slice of the old breweries’ pieces of the pie. What was the secret? Well, beer has four main ingredients – water, grain (malt), hops, and yeast. There is a lot of room for variation. But Lakeport didn’t really taste much different. It tasted like beer. Some people didn’t like it. Those that did like it, bought it.

What was special about Lakeport? It cost about 1/3 less than the beer from the big breweries.

Same great taste. Less financial commitment.

I know a family that has returned to the church after years of being not really interested. When they had kids, it became important for them to connect to a church. Both Mom and Dad in that family were raised in the United Church of Canada, so that made that choice a little easier for them. But they were not caught up in the mumbo-jumbo. They joined for community, for the present world, not for the after-life. They would likely consider themselves Christian by orientation but not by authentication. There is breathing room to think about things, and let the mysterious unknowns be unknown. They go to church when their son doesn’t have hockey, down at the community rink, or their daughter doesn’t have a recital, usually held at the dance school. Individuation is just how people roll these days. They pick and choose their commitments to the church because they wish to be in the church, but not of the church.

Same great community. Less direct control over their lives.

Ian, at irreducible complexity, described his ideal, non-faith-based church in a post several months ago (his sight seems down right now, sorry). Please check it out, if you haven’t looked at it yet. Essentially, it’s a social club for families. A place to mingle and share ideas. A center to initiate and nurture community projects. I would bet the family I mention above would check it out, if there was such a place in their community.

Ian’s post was part of the inspiration for my Integrative Spirituality post. At first I was really struck with just how possible Ian’s ideal church was. But as I got thinking about it, I wondered if his social club was already in place, virtually at least. I mean, this is already happening on the internet. It does not have the same social dynamic or family dynamic. In fact, it separates families into isolated, individuated rooms, making us all the more physically and consciously distant. But it is breaking down the barriers of control around information.

Same great service. Less monopolization?

So what happened to Lakeport? Like I said, the big breweries first ignored it. Then the big breweries tried to copy what Lakeport had done. Then one of the big breweries (itself owned by an even larger brewing company)  simply bought up Lakeport. And the price of Lakeport at the beer store has been on the rise ever since.

I used to be a Lakeport drinker, but it’s kind of lost its flavour. I’m much more interested in the imports and local micro-breweries now. They have some intriguing tastes to offer. And, I don’t mind offering my time and attention to both the international and the local. I’ve even tried home-brew, under my dad’s watchful eye.

The big breweries are still pretty much running the show, unfortunately, and snatch up the little ones that get out of line. But at the same time, I sure hope those big breweries don’t have enough money to buy up everything. That’s not exactly how I want to see the world all become one.


Cheers!


What do you think?



Belief in Community vs Belief in God?

October 29th, 2010   by   Andrew

After living in residence for the first year of school, five of us found a house to live in. Three Catholics at separate and varying levels of devotion, one more-or-less-atheist, and me, Protestant Christian by orientation but undecidedly agnostic. Four of us stayed in the house for the three years of our time in school. The more-or-less-atheist transferred to another university and so his room got taken by another friend that practically lived in the house with us anyway. The new guy was a Canadian by  birth and a slightly-lapsed Hindu by his parents.  He thought we were all pagans anyway.

Religion came up from time to time, but it wasn’t anywhere near as important as Nintendo, Thursday night television (which started the weekend), deciding between A.J.’s downtown or Alfie’s close by,  and football (which wrapped up the weekend). When the topic of religion did come up one time, one of the Catholic guys in the house said something that has stuck with me.

“I don’t believe in God, but I believe in the church.”

“Really?” I said, or something like it.  I was a little shocked, and even slightly offended for some reason. The comment stirred up some level of agreement with the other Catholics, and that surprised me all the more.

Some immediate judgments popped in my brain. Isn’t that hypocritical? Even with all the bad press the priesthood gets? How can the church make sense if it doesn’t have the Big-Guy as justification? I held back and didn’t speak my mind, but I think I might have made a suggestive,  slightly divergent comment. And the conversation went on from there.

This kind of sentiment has turned out to be much more common than I knew at the time. And now, I find it all the more curious and amusing that I have come to share, or at least adopt, a very similar outlook. At the same time though, I can’t help but think it must be near-maddening to take part in something like that, where the social work that is done feels so important but the justification is so conflicted.

What do you think?

- If people put belief in community before belief in God then what does that say about the role of community and the role of God?

- What does the belief in community provide that belief in God does not provide?

- Can an action be more important than the justification used to get it done?

-  [please insert your question or idea here]



SO ALL MAY EAT – The SAME Cafe

March 25th, 2010   by   happynews

Libby and Brad Birky have put a new face on the service world and given a helping hand towards community pride. The two from Denver started the SAME Cafe with a simple model for business — choose your meal, pay what you feel you can, and if you don’t have money, then spend your time helping out in the kitchen.

The menu changes depending on the organic donations and contributions collected. And a simple donations box takes the place of a cash register. The organization accepts payments as well donations to keep the restaurant open, but the customer is the one that either sets the prices or works a few hours for a healthy meal.

When asked how they measure the success of the Same Cafe, Libby said simply, “…not in dollars and cents. I think it’s in people who hug me on the way out the door.” (source)

Let’s hope that more communities can catch this spirit! If you know of anyone else like Libby and Brad, please share their stories!

World Vision has an mp3 report of the cafe here.

You can find other news reports at the Same Cafe website.


New Visions on an Old Path

February 22nd, 2010   by   Andrew

“The beginning of love is to let those we love be perfectly themselves, and not to twist them to fit our own image. Otherwise we love only the reflection of ourselves we find in them.” – Thomas Merton

Less than a year ago I was introduced to a book with the title, “With or Without God: Why the way we live is more important than what we believe“.

It’s something of a challenging title. The author, Gretta Vosper, is a minister in the United Church of Canada and she is trying to be challenging, in the sense that she wants to be true to her own faith.

Her church has put together something they call VisionWorks, a kind of mission statement. I may at some point in the future write up a full review of the book, but for today I just want to talk about the main points of the VisionWorks statement.

At first I felt that it was a collection of  vague attempts at inclusive, inoffensive language that had at best only dulled edges of meaning. But I came back to it with fresh eyes and an open mind. I reread the subtitle and thought a little more about the careful direction of the words:

West Hill United

a progressive spiritual community
growing out of the Christian tradition

It got me thinking of how a Christian would respond. So I want to list the main points of the VisionWorks here and just ask how would a Christian respond to these ideas. Is there anything in these statements that a Christian would object to, or would find against his or her own beliefs?

1. Our grounding is the interconnectedness of all life

2. Our response to life is love

3. Our sources for inspiration are diverse

4. Our gatherings are multi-faceted

5. Our vision is growth

.

By all means I encourage you to check out the complete statement for yourself. I didn’t want to quote the entire thing. But it may be worth mentioning that there is no use of the words God or Jesus. Instead the focus seems to be about serving the community through common values.

.

Is this really all that revolutionary or challenging?

Can a church with such directions and values grow and thrive?

.

.

.

.

.

When an alien lives with you in your land, do not mistreat him. The alien living with you must be treated as one of your native-born. Love him as yourself, for you were aliens in Egypt. — Leviticus 19:33